Sizemore v. Raxter
This text of 334 S.E.2d 391 (Sizemore v. Raxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between the plaintiffs person and the automobile driven by the defendant, Jeffrey Eugene Raxter, and owned by the defendant, Dillard Eugene Raxter. Judge Webb dissented from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis that it was error for the trial judge to submit the issue of last clear chance to the jury.
After reviewing the records and briefs and hearing the oral argument on the question presented by this appeal, we conclude that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is correct and should be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 S.E.2d 391, 314 N.C. 527, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sizemore-v-raxter-nc-1985.