Sixty-01 Association of Apartment Owners v. Public Service Insurance Company

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 SIXTY-01 ASSOCIATION OF CASE NO. C22-1373-JCC APARTMENT OWNERS, 10 ORDER 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 14

15 Defendants. 16

17 In light of various pending deadlines in this matter, the Court recently expedited the 18 briefing schedule for Defendant Public Service Insurance Company’s (“PSIC”) motions to 19 withdraw (Dkt. No. 204) and for relief from certain deadlines (Dkt. No. 206). (See Dkt. No. 207.) 20 Plaintiff timely filed it response October 10, 2024. (See Dkt. No. 212.) PSIC’s response is due 21 today, October 11, 2024. (Id.; see also Dkt. No. 209) (staying certain briefing deadlines). PSIC, 22 through an emergency motion, asks for relief from this October 11, 2024, deadline. (See Dkt. No. 23 214). In support, PSIC cites the size and complexity of Plaintiff’s response, along with the 24 impact of the Yom Kippur holiday, on its ability to review and prepare an adequate reply. (Id. at 25 26 1 2.) Finding good cause,1 PSIC’s request (Dkt. No. 214) is GRANTED. It may file its reply brief 2 on October 14, 2024. 3 DATED this 11th day of October 2024. A 4 5 6 John C. Coughenour 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 1 The Court reaches this finding as an exercise in its authority to modify scheduling orders and briefing schedules, see LCR 7(d), 16(b)(6), which is based on its inherent authority to manage its 26 docket. See All. for the Wild Rockies v. Marten, 200 F. Supp. 3d 1129, 1130 (D. Mont. 2016) (citing Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254–55, (1936)).