Sixth Ave. R. v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 939, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 939 (Sixth Ave. R. v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sixth Ave. R. v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 939, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examining the brief of the counsel for the appellants in this case we do not find any questions of law raised which have not been previously considered and disposed of by this court, and therefore it is not necessary to reconsider them upon this appeal. Upon the questions of fact involved, it does not appear that the learned judge below has committed any errors which would justify this court in reversing the judgment. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, witli costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.Y.S. 939, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sixth-ave-r-v-metropolitan-el-ry-co-nysupct-1892.