Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State

DecidedMarch 24, 2010

Docket12-10-00046-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State (Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO

NO. 12-10-00046-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SIX THOUSAND AND NO/100THS

DOLLARS IN US CURRENCY ($6,000.00),

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 145TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Henry Lamont Caldwell, has failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Pursuant to rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., December 31, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. On February 17, 2010, this court notified Appellant that he should file a docketing statement immediately if he had not already done so.[1] On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Caldwell that the filing fee was due on or before March 1, 2010.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our February 17, 2010 letter, this court issued a second notice on March 5, 2010 advising Caldwell that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Caldwell that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before March 1, 2010, but had not been received. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before March 15, 2010, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee have passed, and Caldwell has not complied with the court’s request. Because Caldwell has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered March 24, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

^{^[1]} Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on December 31, 2008. This court did not receive the notice of appeal until February 17, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO

NO. 12-10-00046-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SIX THOUSAND AND NO/100THS

DOLLARS IN US CURRENCY ($6,000.00),

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 145TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Henry Lamont Caldwell, has failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Pursuant to rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., December 31, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. On February 17, 2010, this court notified Appellant that he should file a docketing statement immediately if he had not already done so.[1] On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Caldwell that the filing fee was due on or before March 1, 2010.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our February 17, 2010 letter, this court issued a second notice on March 5, 2010 advising Caldwell that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Caldwell that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before March 1, 2010, but had not been received. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before March 15, 2010, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee have passed, and Caldwell has not complied with the court’s request. Because Caldwell has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered March 24, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

^{^[1]} Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on December 31, 2008. This court did not receive the notice of appeal until February 17, 2010.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Six Thousand and No/100ths Dollars in US Currency ($6,000.00) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/six-thousand-and-no100ths-dollars-in-us-currency-6-texapp-2010.