SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2011·No. CA 10-01572·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 337 CA 10-01572 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

JOHN T. SIWULA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE AND RAYMOND KRING, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS OF TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------------- DANIEL T. STUTZMAN, RESPONDENT.

JOHN T. SIWULA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

SHULTS AND SHULTS, HORNELL (DAVID A. SHULTS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PATRICK F. MCALLISTER, TOWN ATTORNEY, WAYLAND, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C.

Bradstreet, J.), entered November 25, 2009. The order granted the application of Daniel T. Stutzman, pursuant to Highway Law § 312, to confirm the jury’s determination that a private road across his property was not necessary.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE (SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 312
New York HAY § 312