SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 337 CA 10-01572 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
JOHN T. SIWULA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE AND RAYMOND KRING, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS OF TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------------- DANIEL T. STUTZMAN, RESPONDENT.
JOHN T. SIWULA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.
SHULTS AND SHULTS, HORNELL (DAVID A. SHULTS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PATRICK F. MCALLISTER, TOWN ATTORNEY, WAYLAND, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C.
Bradstreet, J.), entered November 25, 2009. The order granted the application of Daniel T. Stutzman, pursuant to Highway Law § 312, to confirm the jury’s determination that a private road across his property was not necessary.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE (SIWULA, JOHN T. v. TOWN OF HORNELLSVILLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.