Sivo v. Applied Kinesiology & Chiropractic Health Center, Inc.
This text of 718 So. 2d 367 (Sivo v. Applied Kinesiology & Chiropractic Health Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Corrected Opinion
On motion to modify, the previous opinion of this Court filed August 19,1998, is vacated and withdrawn, and the corrected opinion is substituted.
Because a thorough review of the record shows that there was no competent substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s finding that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with work, General Tel. Co. of Fla. v. Board of Review, 356 So.2d 1357, 1358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)(“[I]t is the duty of this court ... to determine whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the appeals referee.”), we reverse the orders of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeals referee’s denial of benefits and affirming the determination that there had been an overpayment of benefits.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 So. 2d 367, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12410, 1998 WL 670249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sivo-v-applied-kinesiology-chiropractic-health-center-inc-fladistctapp-1998.