Sivick, J. v. SEC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 6, 2019·No. 118 MAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN P. SIVICK, : No. 118 MAL 2019 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v. : : : STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, : : Respondent :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1) Whether, under Section 1107(13) of the Public Official and Employees Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101-1113, the State Ethics Commission, upon a finding that a public official or public employee violated the Act, has the authority to order restitution when the individual who obtained financial gain is not the public official or employee, but is an immediate family member of the public official or employee?

2) Whether the action of a public official or public employee reviewing and approving payroll records of a group of subordinate employees, one or more of whom is the public official’s or employee’s immediate family member, falls within the class/subclass exemption of the “conflict of interest” definition in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101-1113?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sivick, J. v. SEC, (Pa. 2019).

Sivick, J. v. SEC (Sivick, J. v. SEC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1101-1113
Pennsylvania § 1101-1113