Siver v. Tyree

Appellate Court of Illinois

Siver v. Tyree

148 Ill. App. 103, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 242

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 12, 1909

DocketGen. No. 14,389

StatusPublished

This text of 148 Ill. App. 103 (Siver v. Tyree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siver v. Tyree, 148 Ill. App. 103, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 242 (Ill. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

This writ of error was consolidated for hearing with case No. 14358, Thomas J. Gannon v. Hiram Tyree, ante, p. 99. While a separate record with abstracts and briefs have been filed in each case, yet there is .no distinguishing feature between them, except that plaintiff here recovered for three monthly payments of $250 each, while the rights of all the parties in both cases rest in the same contract. The judgment in the Municipal Court in this case was for $750.

What we said in the Gannon case is equally decisive of the rights of the parties in the case at bar, and, without here repeating, we adopt as our opinion in this case all that we said in the opinion now filed in the Gannon case, and for the reasons there stated the judgment of the Municipal Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

This writ of error was consolidated for hearing with case No. 14358, Thomas J. Gannon v. Hiram Tyree, ante, p. 99. While a separate record with abstracts and briefs have been filed in each case, yet there is .no distinguishing feature between them, except that plaintiff here recovered for three monthly payments of $250 each, while the rights of all the parties in both cases rest in the same contract. The judgment in the Municipal Court in this case was for $750.

What we said in the Gannon case is equally decisive of the rights of the parties in the case at bar, and, without here repeating, we adopt as our opinion in this case all that we said in the opinion now filed in the Gannon case, and for the reasons there stated the judgment of the Municipal Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 Ill. App. 103, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siver-v-tyree-illappct-1909.