Siver v. North

New York Supreme Court

Siver v. North

18 Johns. 310

DecidedOctober 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Johns. 310 (Siver v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siver v. North, 18 Johns. 310 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff cannot.amend his declaration, as of course, by adding a new count 5 nor can the defendant amend his plea, of course, by adding a new plea. It can only be done by leave of the Court, on special application for that purpose. On this ground, the motiou ought to be denied; but as there appears to have been a mistake on the part'of the plaintiff’s attorney, as to the practice, we grant the rule, on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff cannot.amend his declaration, as of course, by adding a new count 5 nor can the defendant amend his plea, of course, by adding a new plea. It can only be done by leave of the Court, on special application for that purpose. On this ground, the motiou ought to be denied; but as there appears to have been a mistake on the part'of the plaintiff’s attorney, as to the practice, we grant the rule, on payment of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Johns. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siver-v-north-nysupct-1820.