Sivade v. Smith
146 A. 364, 104 N.J. Eq. 528, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 550
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — Fone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sivade v. Smith, 146 A. 364, 104 N.J. Eq. 528, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 550 (N.J. 1929).
146 A. 364 (Sivade v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighino
378 P.2d 97 (California Supreme Court, 1963)
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Haag
40 A.2d 801 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Bloomfield Heights, Inc. v. Holland Associates, Inc.
35 A.2d 622 (New Jersey Circuit Court, 1944)
Smith v. Mangin
161 Misc. 288 (New York City Court, 1936)
Algrod Realty Co. v. Bayerl
160 A. 504 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)