Siuda v. Howard

778 N.E.2d 1052, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1461
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 2002
Docket2002-1065
StatusPublished

This text of 778 N.E.2d 1052 (Siuda v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siuda v. Howard, 778 N.E.2d 1052, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1461 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Hamilton App. Nos. C-000656 and C-000687, 2002-Ohio-2292. Reported at 96 Ohio St.3d 1514, 2002-Ohio-4950, 775 N.E.2d 856. On motion for reconsideration of David G. Howard, M.D., and Tri-State Eye Care, Inc., and on motion to strike David G. Howard, M.D., and Tri-State Care, Inc.’s motion for reconsideration. Motions denied.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 N.E.2d 1052, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siuda-v-howard-ohio-2002.