Siu Ping Lau v. Hon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siu Ping Lau v. Hon

181 A.D.2d 631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D.2d 631 (Siu Ping Lau v. Hon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siu Ping Lau v. Hon, 181 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered September 11, 1991, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against defendant-appellant, and denied defendant’s cross-motion for an order relieving him of his default, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

After a full hearing, at which defendant-appellant had the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine plaintiffs’ witnesses, the Judicial Hearing Officer concluded that defendant had been properly served pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). Inasmuch as the record substantiates the Judicial Hearing Officer’s findings, his report was properly confirmed (see, Kardanis v Velis, 90 AD2d 727). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered September 11, 1991, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against defendant-appellant, and denied defendant’s cross-motion for an order relieving him of his default, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

After a full hearing, at which defendant-appellant had the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine plaintiffs’ witnesses, the Judicial Hearing Officer concluded that defendant had been properly served pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). Inasmuch as the record substantiates the Judicial Hearing Officer’s findings, his report was properly confirmed (see, Kardanis v Velis, 90 AD2d 727). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siu-ping-lau-v-hon-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack