Sitzler v. Lathers, O'Gorman
170 N.E. 139, 252 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 622
Opinion
*552 In each action judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that by reason of the use of the premises the passage to the fire escape was not free and unobstructed; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sitzler v. Lathers, O'Gorman, 170 N.E. 139, 252 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 622 (N.Y. 1929).
170 N.E. 139 (Sitzler v. Lathers, O'Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Lathers
137 Misc. 222 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1930)