Sitz v. Swain

109 P. 273, 56 Or. 544, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 200
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 1910·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appears from the record, and is. conceded by plaintiff, that the decree appealed from was entered on the 20th day of February, 1909. The notice of appeal was not filed until August 23, 1909, three days after the expiration of six months from the entry of the decree. The filing of the notice of appeal with service indorsed thereon within the time prescribed by the statute (Section 549, B. & C. Comp.) is jurisdictional, and the delay is fatal to this appeal. Muckle v. Columbia Co., 56 Or. 146 (108 Pac. 120.)

The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sitz v. Swain, 109 P. 273, 56 Or. 544, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 200 (Or. 1910).

109 P. 273 (Sitz v. Swain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Utah Copper Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
203 P. 627 (Utah Supreme Court, 1921)
First Nat. Bank v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co.
159 P. 561 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
In re Willow Creek
144 P. 505 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Pinney & Boyle Co. v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.
141 P. 620 (California Supreme Court, 1914)
State ex rel. Webster v. Superior Court
120 P. 861 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
Portland Ry. Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission
105 P. 709 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)