Sittig v. Pennsylvania Railroad
77 A. 1097, 229 Pa. 15, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 545
This text of 77 A. 1097 (Sittig v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sittig v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 77 A. 1097, 229 Pa. 15, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 545 (Pa. 1910).
Opinion
It is manifest from the testimony produced by the plaintiff that the collision in which her husband was killed was not caused by an unsafe schedule or by defective rules of the defendant company, but was due entirely to his disregard of a clearly defined and well understood duty.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned trial judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 A. 1097, 229 Pa. 15, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sittig-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pa-1910.