Sittig v. Littell

21 La. Ann. 646
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1869·No. No. 622·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Howell, J.

In this case judgment in solido was obtained against the two makers and the indorser of a promissory note, from which the two makers took this appeal by petition and asked that the plaintiff be cited. It is manifest that the indorser has an interest and should be a party to the appeal, and as this court will notice, of its own motion, the want of proper parties, the appeal must be dismissed. 12 R. 203 ; 4 A. 577; 11 A. 409; 12 A. 755, 774, 801; 3 A. 317; 19 A. 137.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sittig v. Littell, 21 La. Ann. 646 (La. 1869).

21 La. Ann. 646 (Sittig v. Littell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.
6 La. App. 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
McCutchen v. Hudson
61 So. 157 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Chicago-Texas Land & Lumber Co. v. Sabine River Lumber Co.
57 So. 1003 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)