Sitkiewitz v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
This text of 245 A.D. 737 (Sitkiewitz v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover for wrongful death of a nine-year old girl, [738]*738order granting defendant’s motion to set aside a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,150 unless the plaintiff stipulate to accept $2,650 reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered thereon. It may not be said as a matter of law that the verdict of the jury is excessive. It is far below the verdicts in similar cases that have been sustained by this court. The fixing of pecuniary damages in a death case is peculiarly for a jury, and their assessment should not be disturbed except in an extraordinary situation. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sitkiewitz-v-central-hudson-gas-electric-corp-nyappdiv-1935.