Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal
26 Pa. 178
This text of 26 Pa. 178 (Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal, 26 Pa. 178 (Pa. 1856).
Opinion
[184]*184The opinion of the court was delivered by
The learned arid able argument of, the appellants’ counsel has failed to shake the conclusions of the auditor, and we adopt them, with the reasons given by the auditor, as the law of this case.
The decree of distribution is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Guzikowski
1 Pa. D. & C.3d 617 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1976)
Kachel Appeal
33 Pa. D. & C.2d 274 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1963)
Lawrence B. And Harriet F. Vogel v. Northern Assurance Company, Limited, and Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company (Two Cases)
219 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1955)
Butler County Commissioners' Petition
15 A.2d 504 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Paul's Estate
154 A. 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Zierdt v. Kiel or Keal
98 Pa. Super. 604 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
United States v. Dunn
268 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Hess v. Vinton Colliery Co.
99 A. 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Peoples Street Ry. Co. v. Spencer
27 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)
Potter v. Langstrath
25 A. 76 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 Pa. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siter-james-cos-appeal-pa-1856.