Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors

179 S.E. 354, 180 Ga. 510, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 460

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 25, 1935·No. No. 10514·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. Inasmuch as no extraordinary relief was prayed, the petition did not require the sanction of the judge prior to its filing, under the Code of 1933, § 81-112 (Code of 1910, § 5545) ; Dougherty v. Fouche, 149 Ga. 608 (101 S. E. 578).

2. The refusal of the judge to order the petition filed was not a final judgment that could be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Code of 1933, § 6-701 (Code of 1910, § 6138).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Gilbert, J., concurs' specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

1. Inasmuch as no extraordinary relief was prayed, the petition did not require the sanction of the judge prior to its filing, under the Code of 1933, § 81-112 (Code of 1910, § 5545) ; Dougherty v. Fouche, 149 Ga. 608 (101 S. E. 578).

2. The refusal of the judge to order the petition filed was not a final judgment that could be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Code of 1933, § 6-701 (Code of 1910, § 6138).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Gilbert, J., concurs' specially.

Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors, 179 S.E. 354, 180 Ga. 510, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

179 S.E. 354 (Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related