Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors

179 S.E. 354, 180 Ga. 510, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 460

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 25, 1935

DocketNo. 10514

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 354 (Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sistrunk v. Weyman-Connors, 179 S.E. 354, 180 Ga. 510, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. Inasmuch as no extraordinary relief was prayed, the petition did not require the sanction of the judge prior to its filing, under the Code of 1933, § 81-112 (Code of 1910, § 5545) ; Dougherty v. Fouche, 149 Ga. 608 (101 S. E. 578).

2. The refusal of the judge to order the petition filed was not a final judgment that could be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Code of 1933, § 6-701 (Code of 1910, § 6138).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Gilbert, J., concurs' specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI