Sistrunk v. Mangum

75 S.E. 7, 138 Ga. 222, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 266
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 30, 1912·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

Where a judgment of the court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was rendered in term, on December 14, 1911, and the bill of exceptions assigning error thereon was certified on January 5, 1912, and there is nothing in the bill of exceptions, or the entries thereon, or the record, showing that the bill of exceptions was presented to the judge within twenty days from the date of the decision complained of, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error, and it must be dismissed. Thompson v. McGhee, 93 Ga. 254 (19 S. E. 32); Holder v. Jelks, 116 Ga. 134 (42 S. E. 100); Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (57 S. E. 240), and cases cited; Curtis v. Town of Mansfield, 132 Ga. 444 (64 S. E. 327), and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sistrunk v. Mangum, 75 S.E. 7, 138 Ga. 222, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 266 (Ga. 1912).

75 S.E. 7 (Sistrunk v. Mangum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durrell v. White
31 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Powell v. Georgia Public-Service Commission
197 S.E. 792 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
King v. State
149 S.E. 650 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Francis v. Porter
91 S.E. 68 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Glawson v. State
78 S.E. 188 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)