Sisters of Peace v. Westervelt

48 A. 789, 65 N.J.L. 685, 36 Vroom 685, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 162
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 4, 1901·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed in this case for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

It has been suggested that the Supreme Court erroneously set aside so much of the assessment for taxes which was under review as applied to the chapel on the premises because the evidence showed that the chapel was not built when the assessment was levied. But the foundation for that action is in a stipulation entered into by the counsel of the respective parties that the chapel contained on the premises the assessment of which was brought up by the certiorari stands upon a curtilage fifty by one hundred feet and that the valuation of said chapel and curtilage is agreed to be $1,200.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Van Syckel. Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 1Ó.

For reversal—The Chiee Justice, Collins. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sisters of Peace v. Westervelt, 48 A. 789, 65 N.J.L. 685, 36 Vroom 685, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 162 (N.J. 1901).

48 A. 789 (Sisters of Peace v. Westervelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paper Mill Playhouse v. Millburn Township
472 A.2d 517 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Playhouse v. Millburn Township
455 A.2d 1128 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Bloomfield v. ACADEMY OF MED. OF NJ
210 A.2d 420 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)