Sisters of Peace v. Westervelt
This text of 48 A. 789 (Sisters of Peace v. Westervelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed in this case for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
It has been suggested that the Supreme Court erroneously set aside so much of the assessment for taxes which was under review as applied to the chapel on the premises because the evidence showed that the chapel was not built when the assessment was levied. But the foundation for that action is in a stipulation entered into by the counsel of the respective parties that the chapel contained on the premises the assessment of which was brought up by the certiorari stands upon a curtilage fifty by one hundred feet and that the valuation of said chapel and curtilage is agreed to be $1,200.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Van Syckel. Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 1Ó.
For reversal—The Chiee Justice, Collins. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A. 789, 65 N.J.L. 685, 36 Vroom 685, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sisters-of-peace-v-westervelt-nj-1901.