Sisson v. Harvey

Washington Supreme Court

Sisson v. Harvey

212 P. 1052, 123 Wash. 650, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1923

DocketNo. 17771

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 P. 1052 (Sisson v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sisson v. Harvey, 212 P. 1052, 123 Wash. 650, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785 (Wash. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal bond in this case was not given by the appellants to the adverse party to the judgment and is therefore ineffectual. Bruhn v. Steffins, 66 Wash. 144, 199 Pac. 29. The situation is unfortunately such that an amended bond cannot be filed, and the benefit of § 1730-9, Rem. Comp. Stat. is not available. Mogelberg v. Calhoun, 94 Wash. 662, 163 Pac. 29; Salvino v. Taylor Mill Co., 102 Wash. 507, 173 Pac. 433; Den Bleyker v. King County, 108 Wash. 687, 185 Pac. 613.

For that reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal bond in this case was not given by the appellants to the adverse party to the judgment and is therefore ineffectual. Bruhn v. Steffins, 66 Wash. 144, 199 Pac. 29. The situation is unfortunately such that an amended bond cannot be filed, and the benefit of § 1730-9, Rem. Comp. Stat. is not available. Mogelberg v. Calhoun, 94 Wash. 662, 163 Pac. 29; Salvino v. Taylor Mill Co., 102 Wash. 507, 173 Pac. 433; Den Bleyker v. King County, 108 Wash. 687, 185 Pac. 613.

For that reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 P. 1052, 123 Wash. 650, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sisson-v-harvey-wash-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack