Sisson v. Harvey

212 P. 1052, 123 Wash. 650, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 1923·No. No. 17771·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal bond in this case was not given by the appellants to the adverse party to the judgment and is therefore ineffectual. Bruhn v. Steffins, 66 Wash. 144, 199 Pac. 29. The situation is unfortunately such that an amended bond cannot be filed, and the benefit of § 1730-9, Rem. Comp. Stat. is not available. Mogelberg v. Calhoun, 94 Wash. 662, 163 Pac. 29; Salvino v. Taylor Mill Co., 102 Wash. 507, 173 Pac. 433; Den Bleyker v. King County, 108 Wash. 687, 185 Pac. 613.

For that reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sisson v. Harvey, 212 P. 1052, 123 Wash. 650, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785 (Wash. 1923).

212 P. 1052 (Sisson v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richmond v. Williamson
132 P.2d 1031 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Olmstead v. McCleary
223 P. 15 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)