Siskavich v. Broadnax

156 A.D.2d 779, 550 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15731

This text of 156 A.D.2d 779 (Siskavich v. Broadnax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siskavich v. Broadnax, 156 A.D.2d 779, 550 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Viscardi, J.), entered November 10, 1988 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner seeks review of an administrative determination made more than four months prior to the attempted commencement of this proceeding (see, CPLR 217; Matter of Miller v Ambach, 124 AD2d 882). In any event, the petition was never served in the manner required by CPLR 7804 (c). The judgment dismissing the petition should, therefore, lie affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Ambach
124 A.D.2d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A.D.2d 779, 550 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siskavich-v-broadnax-nyappdiv-1989.