Sisk v. United States

647 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 26, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7949
StatusPublished

This text of 647 F. App'x 188 (Sisk v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sisk v. United States, 647 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Sisk appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Sisk’s civil complaint, which was filed against the United States pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2012), and denying Sisk’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Sisk v. United States, No. 1:15-cv-00154-FDW (W.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015 & Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[189]*189gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Creation of remedy
28 U.S.C. § 2201

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sisk-v-united-states-ca4-2016.