Sisk v. State
This text of 127 So. 926 (Sisk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a judgment of conviction for the offense of 'carrying a concealed pistol about his person, this appeal was taken.
*675 Upon the trial, a question of fact only was involved. In our opinion the evidence adduced was ample to justify the jury in returning the verdict of guilty.
No question of law of sufficient import to require the consideration of this court appears to be involved.
The record is regular, and, as the trial prqceeded throughout without prejudicial error, . the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. •
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sisk-v-state-alactapp-1930.