Sisk v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sisk v. State

127 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 674

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 1930·No. 8 Div. 928.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN,'P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of 'carrying a concealed pistol about his person, this appeal was taken.

*675 Upon the trial, a question of fact only was involved. In our opinion the evidence adduced was ample to justify the jury in returning the verdict of guilty.

No question of law of sufficient import to require the consideration of this court appears to be involved.

The record is regular, and, as the trial prqceeded throughout without prejudicial error, . the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. •

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN,'P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of 'carrying a concealed pistol about his person, this appeal was taken.

*675 Upon the trial, a question of fact only was involved. In our opinion the evidence adduced was ample to justify the jury in returning the verdict of guilty.

No question of law of sufficient import to require the consideration of this court appears to be involved.

The record is regular, and, as the trial prqceeded throughout without prejudicial error, . the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. •

Affirmed.

Sisk v. State, 127 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 674 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

127 So. 926 (Sisk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.