Sisk v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
This text of Sisk v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility (Sisk v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
BRAYLON ANTWONIE SISK PLAINTIFF
v. No. 4:20-cv-1121-DPM-JTR BRIGGS, Major, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility . DEFENDANT
ORDER The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ray’s unopposed partial recommendation, Doc. 36. FED. R. Clv. P.72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion for summary judgment, Doc. 26, granted in part and denied in part. Sisk’s First Amendment retaliation and Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Briggs go forward. Sisk has not alleged adequately that he has standing to challenge Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility’s new speech policy, so that claim is dismissed without prejudice. Zanders v. Swanson, 573 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 2009). The Court expresses no opinion on the constitutionality of the new policy. Compare United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012).
So Ordered. __WPgastell fs D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge
— AL Mack 2002
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sisk v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sisk-v-pulaski-county-regional-detention-facility-ared-2022.