Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sirota v. Shacknovitz

Sirota v. Shacknovitz

212 A.D. 884
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D. 884 (Sirota v. Shacknovitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sirota v. Shacknovitz, 212 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Upon reargument, judgment reversed on the law, and a now trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon authority of Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. (210 App. Div. 461) and O’Connor v. Webber (239 N. Y. 191). Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur, Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the situation presented in the .case at bar is different from the Happel ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Connor v. Webber
146 N.E. 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
210 A.D. 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sirota-v-shacknovitz-nyappdiv-1925.