Sirois Leather, Inc. v. Lea-Suede Corp.

44 A.D.2d 815, 355 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4959
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1974·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 12,1973, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it is an unlicensed foreign corporation doing business in New York, unanimously reversed,, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the complaint reinstated. On the record before us it appears that plaintiff maintains no office, warehouse, telephone listing or bank account in this State. Its activities here are limited to the solicitation of orders through an independent sales agent which are then confirmed and accepted in Massachusetts. Such activities do not constitute “doing business in this state” within the contemplation of section 1312 of the Business Corporation Law. (Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N Y 2d 475; International Text Book Co. v. Tone, 220 N. Y. 313.) Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sirois Leather, Inc. v. Lea-Suede Corp., 44 A.D.2d 815, 355 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

44 A.D.2d 815 (Sirois Leather, Inc. v. Lea-Suede Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maro Leather Co. v. Aerolineas Argentinas
161 Misc. 2d 920 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Laufer v. Ostrow
107 Misc. 2d 690 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Colonial Mortgage Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
57 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Paper Manufacturers Co. v. Ris Paper Co.
86 Misc. 95 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Overmyer v. Eliot Realty
83 Misc. 2d 694 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)