Sirmons v. Sirmons
This text of 137 S.E.2d 31 (Sirmons v. Sirmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being neither an acknowledgment of nor waiver of service entered upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, nor service of the bill of exceptions in any manner as required by law, the motion to dismiss it for lack of proper service is meritorious. Code Ann. § 6-911 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 456); Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co., 119 Ga. 514 (46 SE 637); Warnock v. Woodard, 183 Ga. 367 (188 SE 336); Wright v. Wheatley, 210 Ga. 35 (77 SE2d 435); Nichols v. Nichols, 210 Ga. 232 (78 SE2d 513). Accordingly, the writ of error is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 S.E.2d 31, 220 Ga. 65, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sirmons-v-sirmons-ga-1964.