Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Sirmons v. Sirmons

Sirmons v. Sirmons

137 S.E.2d 31, 220 Ga. 65, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 449
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1964·No. 22490·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

There being neither an acknowledgment of nor waiver of service entered upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, nor service of the bill of exceptions in any manner as required by law, the motion to dismiss it for lack of proper service is meritorious. Code Ann. § 6-911 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 456); Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co., 119 Ga. 514 (46 SE 637); Warnock v. Woodard, 183 Ga. 367 (188 SE 336); Wright v. Wheatley, 210 Ga. 35 (77 SE2d 435); Nichols v. Nichols, 210 Ga. 232 (78 SE2d 513). Accordingly, the writ of error is

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Argued May 11, 1964 Decided May 19, 1964. T. E. Miller, Elsie H. Griner, for plaintiff in error. Fred T. Allen, Edward Parrish, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sirmons v. Sirmons, 137 S.E.2d 31, 220 Ga. 65, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 449 (Ga. 1964).

137 S.E.2d 31 (Sirmons v. Sirmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co.
46 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Warnock v. Woodard
188 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Wright v. Wheatley
77 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Nichols v. Nichols
78 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)