Sirmans v. City of Ray City

124 S.E. 60, 32 Ga. App. 430, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 441
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 10, 1924·No. 15514·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

An action for money damages against a municipal corporation, for injuries to person or property, cannot be maintained unless it is made to appear that before the suit was filed the governing authority of the municipality was furnished with a written statement of the plaintiff’s claim, and that such statement set forth the time, the place, and the extent of the alleged injuries as near as practicable, and the negligence which caused them. Civil Code (1910), § 910; Marks v. City of Rome, 145 Ga. 399 (3) (89 S. E. 324); City Council of Augusta v. Marks, 124 Ga. 368 (52 S. E. 539); Maryon v. City of Atlanta, 149 Ga. 36 (99 S. E. 116).

(a) While a substantial compliance with the above-cited code section is all that is required (Langley v. Augusta, 118 Ga. 590 (11), 600, 45 S. E. 486), the petition as amended in the instant case showed no such compliance and was fatally defective in this respect. It follows that the court did not err in dismissing it on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Jeff S. Story, for plaintiff. P. T. Knight, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sirmans v. City of Ray City, 124 S.E. 60, 32 Ga. App. 430, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 441 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

124 S.E. 60 (Sirmans v. City of Ray City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Mayor of Savannah
184 S.E. 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
City of Atlanta v. Blackmon
178 S.E. 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)