Sirman Use of Tunnel v. Barnard's Adm'rx.

Superior Court of Delaware

Sirman Use of Tunnel v. Barnard's Adm'rx.

1 Del. 497

DecidedJuly 5, 1835

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 497 (Sirman Use of Tunnel v. Barnard's Adm'rx.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sirman Use of Tunnel v. Barnard's Adm'rx., 1 Del. 497 (Del. Ct. App. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

Rule to show cause why an award should not be set aside on the ground that no notice of the meeting of the arbitrators was given to the defendant. The reference specified that the rule might be executed exporte on ten days notice. It was admitted that notice had not been served on the deft, but on her counsel. Mrs. Bernard resides in the county.

Rule absolute, (a)

(a)

See Cazier vs. Blackstock, ante 362.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rule to show cause why an award should not be set aside on the ground that no notice of the meeting of the arbitrators was given to the defendant. The reference specified that the rule might be executed exporte on ten days notice. It was admitted that notice had not been served on the deft, but on her counsel. Mrs. Bernard resides in the county.

Rule absolute, (a)

(a)

See Cazier vs. Blackstock, ante 362.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sirman-use-of-tunnel-v-barnards-admrx-delsuperct-1835.