Sirles v. Harvey
256 A.D.2d 1229, 682 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14402
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sirles v. Harvey. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 1227 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; see also, Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sirles v. Harvey, 256 A.D.2d 1229, 682 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
256 A.D.2d 1229 (Sirles v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)