Sirina Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 4, 2014
• Docket: 14-1729
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1729

SIRINA SUCKLAL,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Creditor – Appellee,

NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00039-JFM)

Submitted: November 25, 2014 Decided: December 4, 2014

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Christopher Mullen, MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sirina Sucklal appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order

lifting the automatic stay and allowing the sale of her real

property. We have reviewed the record and find no error in the

bankruptcy court’s decision. See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393,

398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district

court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we

“review directly the bankruptcy court’s decision”).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED