Sirijo Tanfara v. Immigration And Naturalization Service

331 F.2d 851, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5264
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 26, 1964·No. 14644_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

331 F.2d 851

Sirijo TANFARA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Dominick F. Rinaldi,
District Director, H. S. Klegman, Ass't. District
Director for Deportation, Respondents.

No. 14644.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 18, 1964.
Decided May 26, 1964.

Stephen Mongiello, Hoboken, N.J., for petitioner.

Merna Marshall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Maurice A. Roberts, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel, on the brief), for respondents.

Before HASTIE, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this case we have reviewed an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals which affirmed a decision of a special inquiry officer of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, finding that the petitioner Tanfara was a deportable alien and ineligible for any form of discretionary relief from deportation. We have examined the record in the light of the controlling statutes and are satisfied that the administrative decision was correct.

The order of the Board will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sirijo Tanfara v. Immigration And Naturalization Service, 331 F.2d 851, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5264 (3d Cir. 1964).

331 F.2d 851 (Sirijo Tanfara v. Immigration And Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related