Siravakian v. Efremidis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siravakian v. Efremidis

49 A.D.2d 863, 374 N.Y.S.2d 319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 863 (Siravakian v. Efremidis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siravakian v. Efremidis, 49 A.D.2d 863, 374 N.Y.S.2d 319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 25, 1974, denying plaintiff’s motion for a rehearing, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, said motion granted and, upon such rehearing, defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to timely serve a complaint denied and defendant directed to accept service of such complaint. The concurrent appeal from the prior order of said court, entered April 2, 1974, is unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs and without disbursements. The record before us discloses that the six-month delay in serving the complaint was attributable to settlement negotiations which terminated only a few days before the instant motion was made. Since the delay is excusable and a meritorious cause has been pleaded, the dismissal of the action was unwarranted. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 25, 1974, denying plaintiff’s motion for a rehearing, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, said motion granted and, upon such rehearing, defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to timely serve a complaint denied and defendant directed to accept service of such complaint. The concurrent appeal from the prior order of said court, entered April 2, 1974, is unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs and without disbursements. The record before us discloses that the six-month delay in serving the complaint was attributable to settlement negotiations which terminated only a few days before the instant motion was made. Since the delay is excusable and a meritorious cause has been pleaded, the dismissal of the action was unwarranted. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 863, 374 N.Y.S.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siravakian-v-efremidis-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack