Siraj v. Ashcroft
This text of Siraj v. Ashcroft (Siraj v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1537
NADIYA BEYAN SIRAJ,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-872-452)
Submitted: April 16, 2004 Decided: June 8, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Nelda C. Ackerman, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Nadiya Beyan Siraj petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the
immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the
Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In
re: Siraj, No. A77-872-452 (B.I.A. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Siraj v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siraj-v-ashcroft-ca4-2004.