Siraj v. Ashcroft

Fourth Circuit

Siraj v. Ashcroft

98 F. App'x 965

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2004·No. No. 03-1537·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nadiya Beyan Siraj petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversiblé error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Siraj, No. A77-872-452 (B.I.A. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nadiya Beyan Siraj petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversiblé error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Siraj, No. A77-872-452 (B.I.A. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Siraj v. Ashcroft, 98 F. App'x 965 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 965 (Siraj v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related