Sir Maurice Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institute Division

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 2008
Docket13-06-00254-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sir Maurice Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institute Division (Sir Maurice Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institute Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sir Maurice Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institute Division, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-00254-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________________________

SIR MAURICE JOHNSON, Appellant,



v.



TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE INSTITUTE DIVISION, ET AL., Appellees.

________________________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Rodriguez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Sir Maurice Johnson, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-04-1394-CV-C. The clerk's record in the above cause was received by this Court on October 1, 2007. The supplemental clerk's record was received on October 4, 2007. Upon inspection of the record, it appears that there is not a final, appealable judgment. On October 5, 2007, the Court gave appellant notice of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. The Court notified appellant that if this defect were not cured within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a)(c).

Appellant has failed to respond or otherwise correct the defect, and accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of January, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sir Maurice Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institute Division, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sir-maurice-johnson-v-texas-department-of-criminal-texapp-2008.