Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 27, 2007
Docket13-06-00252-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez (Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-252-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________



SIR MAURICE JOHNSON, Appellant,



v.


NANCY A. PEREZ, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 36th District Court
of Bee County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, SIR MAURICE JOHNSON, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-05-1089-CV-A. The order of dismissal in this cause was signed on November 9, 2005. An untimely motion for reconsideration was filed on January 9, 2006. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on December 9, 2005, but was not filed until January 9, 2006.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant filed a motion to extend the time to correct the defect; however, to date, appellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise show this Court's jurisdiction in this matter.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. All pending motions in this cause are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 27th day of September, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sir-maurice-johnson-v-nancy-a-perez-texapp-2007.