Sir Gean Amos v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Sea-Land Services, Inc. Crawford & Company

Ninth Circuit

Sir Gean Amos v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Sea-Land Services, Inc. Crawford & Company

164 F.3d 480, 99 Daily Journal DAR 400, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 324, 1999 A.M.C. 910, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 300, 1999 WL 8000

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 12, 1999·No. 96-70988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

It is ordered that the Opinion filed on September 1,1998, be amended to delete the final paragraph reported on page 10084 of the Slip Opinion [153 F.3d at 1054] and to substitute the following paragraph in its place:

We remand to the ALJ with instructions to grant Amos’s request for surgery and to redetermine, consistent with this opinion, Amos’s entitlement to temporary disability benefits from February 13, 1992 pending his maximum medical improvement, and if appropriate thereafter, permanent disability benefits.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en bane. Fed. RApp. P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

It is ordered that the Opinion filed on September 1,1998, be amended to delete the final paragraph reported on page 10084 of the Slip Opinion [153 F.3d at 1054] and to substitute the following paragraph in its place:

We remand to the ALJ with instructions to grant Amos’s request for surgery and to redetermine, consistent with this opinion, Amos’s entitlement to temporary disability benefits from February 13, 1992 pending his maximum medical improvement, and if appropriate thereafter, permanent disability benefits.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en bane. Fed. RApp. P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Sir Gean Amos v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Sea-Land Services, Inc. Crawford & Company, 164 F.3d 480, 99 Daily Journal DAR 400, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 324, 1999 A.M.C. 910, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 300, 1999 WL 8000 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

164 F.3d 480 (Sir Gean Amos v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Sea-Land Services, Inc. Crawford & Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related