Siquina-Tasej v. SAIF

474 P.3d 415, 307 Or. App. 202
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 7, 2020
DocketA165112
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 P.3d 415 (Siquina-Tasej v. SAIF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siquina-Tasej v. SAIF, 474 P.3d 415, 307 Or. App. 202 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Argued and submitted January 7, 2019, affirmed October 7, 2020, petition for review denied March 18, 2021 (367 Or 709)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Pascual Siquina-Tasej, Claimant. Pascual SIQUINA-TASEJ, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Willamette Valley Meat Company, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1600382, 1505907; A165112 474 P3d 415

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Julie Masters argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Coleman v. SAIF, 304 Or App 122, 466 P3d 967, rev den, 367 Or 75 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Case v. Cain
474 P.3d 415 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 P.3d 415, 307 Or. App. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siquina-tasej-v-saif-orctapp-2020.