Sipson v. Aloisio

278 A.D. 1013, 106 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5516
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 1013 (Sipson v. Aloisio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sipson v. Aloisio, 278 A.D. 1013, 106 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The language of the contract between the plaintiff and defendant leaves no other inference than that the parties intended there should be no partition of the subject property. Equity will not award partition at the suit of one in violation of his own agreement. (Chew v. Seldom,, 214 N. Y. 344.) While we hold that the contract is a complete defense to plaintiff’s action for partition, we do not pass upon any other questions relating to the rights of the parties under their contract. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in a partition action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tramontano v. Catalano
23 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Yeshiva University v. Edelman
16 Misc. 2d 931 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Schneidman v. Steckler
11 Misc. 2d 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 1013, 106 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipson-v-aloisio-nyappdiv-1951.