Sipple v. Scotten
This text of 1 Del. 107 (Sipple v. Scotten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said the sale must be set aside. The property was not levied on until the day of sale. The act of assembly (Dig. 240.^ provides that goods shall not be sold until thirty days after levy and. notice. In England seizure and possession is the only levy, but here the practice is not to take the goods into actual possession. Is not therefore an inventory and appraisement the substitute for the levy? It would seem reasonable. But the lease was not advertised. *108 Every article need not be specified in the notice of sale, but the most prominent and valuable should be. An unexpired term in a farm is of this description and ought to have been noticed. It sold in this case for $17, and is proved to have been worth $150.
Rule absolute,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Del. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipple-v-scotten-delsuperct-1832.