Sipple v. Rochester Railways Co-Ordinated Bus Lines, Inc.

232 A.D. 877

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appeUant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding of the jury that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence was against the weight of the evidence. (See Shirley v. Larkin, 239 N. Y. 94.) AH concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sipple v. Rochester Railways Co-Ordinated Bus Lines, Inc., 232 A.D. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

232 A.D. 877 (Sipple v. Rochester Railways Co-Ordinated Bus Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley v. Larkin Co.
145 N.E. 751 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)