Sipp v. Sipp
This text of 197 A.2d 73 (Sipp v. Sipp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has appealed from a judgment granting the plaintiff, his wife, a legal separation on the ground of intolerable cruelty and awarding her custody of and support for two of their three minor children and alimony. The defendant seeks to substitute 181 paragraphs of his oversized 305-paragraph draft finding for 52 of the 166 paragraphs of facts found by the court. In effect, he is attempting to retry the case on appeal. This practice has been repeatedly discouraged. Ball v. Branford, 142 Conn. 13, 15, 110 A.2d 459. The minor corrections to which he is entitled will not change the result. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Murray, 145 Conn. 427, 429, 143 A.2d 646.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.2d 73, 151 Conn. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipp-v-sipp-conn-1964.