Siporin v. Auto Club Insurance Association

716 N.W.2d 588, 475 Mich. 903
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 12, 2006
Docket131500
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 716 N.W.2d 588 (Siporin v. Auto Club Insurance Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siporin v. Auto Club Insurance Association, 716 N.W.2d 588, 475 Mich. 903 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

716 N.W.2d 588 (2006)
475 Mich. 903

Steve SIPORIN, as Guardian of Leonard Serafin, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 131500. COA No. 269727.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 12, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The motion to stay the trial court proceedings is GRANTED, and the proceedings in the Washtenaw Circuit Court are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not *589 being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MCRI v. Board of State Canvassers
716 N.W.2d 590 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Joliet v. Pitoniak
716 N.W.2d 588 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
716 N.W.2d 588, 475 Mich. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siporin-v-auto-club-insurance-association-mich-2006.