Siple v. First Franklin Financial Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Siple v. First Franklin Financial Corp.

653 F. App'x 786

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2446

StatusPublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 786 (Siple v. First Franklin Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siple v. First Franklin Financial Corp., 653 F. App'x 786 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis R. Siple and Marion C. Siple appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil action regarding the foreclosure of the Siples’ property and denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Siple v. First Franklin Fin. Corp., No. 1:14-cv-02841-RDB (D. Md. May 15, 2015; Oct. 19, 2015).. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis R. Siple and Marion C. Siple appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil action regarding the foreclosure of the Siples’ property and denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Siple v. First Franklin Fin. Corp., No. 1:14-cv-02841-RDB (D. Md. May 15, 2015; Oct. 19, 2015).. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 F. App'x 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siple-v-first-franklin-financial-corp-ca4-2016.