Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Sipal Realty Corp. v. William

Sipal Realty Corp. v. William

21 Misc. 2d 287, 199 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2547
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 25, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 2d 287 (Sipal Realty Corp. v. William) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sipal Realty Corp. v. William, 21 Misc. 2d 287, 199 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court below based its decision on a finding that rent was due in accordance with a judgment rendered in Special Term, Supreme Court. Thereafter, the Appellate Division reversed the Special Term. (Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. [Dankers], 16 Misc 2d 827, revd. 8 A D 2d 355.) While the preferable practice would have been to move in the Municipal Court for a new trial (Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N. Y. 386) we see no reason why the procedure should not be expedited. We, therefore, reverse the final order and direct a final order in favor of the tenant, without costs.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parkhurst v. . Berdell
18 N.E. 123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
In re Sipal Realty Corp.
16 Misc. 2d 827 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Misc. 2d 287, 199 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipal-realty-corp-v-william-nyappterm-1959.