Sipal Realty Corp. v. Dankers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sipal Realty Corp. v. Dankers

7 A.D.2d 986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 986 (Sipal Realty Corp. v. Dankers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sipal Realty Corp. v. Dankers, 7 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to modify the conditions contained in the order of this court entered January 13, 1959, staying the enforcement of the final order appealed from, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, by further enlarging the time of the appellants to perfect and notice their appeal for argument for the May 1959 Term of this court, in accordance with the decision filed simultaneously herewith in Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. v. Bankers (7 A D 2d 986), upon the condition that the appellants deposit in escrow with the respondent the difference between the current increased rent and the old rent for an additional period of two months or furnish a suitable, bond to secure the payment thereof. Concur ■— Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to modify the conditions contained in the order of this court entered January 13, 1959, staying the enforcement of the final order appealed from, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, by further enlarging the time of the appellants to perfect and notice their appeal for argument for the May 1959 Term of this court, in accordance with the decision filed simultaneously herewith in Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. v. Bankers (7 A D 2d 986), upon the condition that the appellants deposit in escrow with the respondent the difference between the current increased rent and the old rent for an additional period of two months or furnish a suitable, bond to secure the payment thereof. Concur ■— Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipal-realty-corp-v-dankers-nyappdiv-1959.