Siounis v. So-Gus Realty Corp.

220 A.D.2d 495, 632 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993

This text of 220 A.D.2d 495 (Siounis v. So-Gus Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siounis v. So-Gus Realty Corp., 220 A.D.2d 495, 632 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract for the sale of [496]*496real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated April 4, 1994, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment against the defendant So-Gus Realty Corp. with respect to his second cause of action.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the motion, and substituting therefor a provision granting the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against the defendant So-Gus Realty Corp. with respect to his second cause of action as to liability only; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

In support of his motion for partial summary judgment, the plaintiff seller submitted proof in admissible form of the contract and its terms, his readiness, willingness, and ability to convey title to the property on the date of closing, and the refusal to perform by the defendant So-Gus Realty Corp. (hereinafter So-Gus Realty). The plaintiff also submitted So-Gus Realty’s responses to his requests to admit wherein So-Gus Realty admitted the existence of the contract and its failure to close title and tender the balance due under the contract. Thus, the plaintiff sustained his burden by making a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the second cause of action as to liability (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Kypreos v Spiridellis, 124 AD2d 786), and there should be a trial on the issue of damages. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Kypreos v. Spiridellis
124 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 A.D.2d 495, 632 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siounis-v-so-gus-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1995.