Siorek v. Zablocki

267 A.D.2d 299, 699 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12880
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated December 15, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment, entered January 27, 1998, upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established both a reasonable excuse for his default in interposing an answer and a meritorious defense (see, Hinderer v Erbesh, 240 AD2d 707; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). Therefore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment which was entered upon his default. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siorek v. Zablocki, 267 A.D.2d 299, 699 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 299 (Siorek v. Zablocki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Siorek v. Zablocki
6 A.D.3d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Erdheim v. Deutsch
282 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)